Search

Recent Articles

Recent Comments


« | Main | »

Realtors and police may join forces to protect potential homeowners

By Hempology | July 6, 2007

The Record, ON
05 Jul 2007
Cherri Greeno

HOME-GROW REGISTRY WANTED

Real Estate Board Asks Police To Let Homeowners Know Locations Of Busted Marijuana Operations

Real estate agents and local police are working together to ensure potential homeowners don’t get duped into buying a home once used in an illegal drug operation.

“We do have situations where clients are, unbeknownst to them, buying former grow operations,” Tania Benninger, president of the K-W Real Estate Board, said in an interview yesterday.

“They rely on realtors to disclose anything they can about the property and Realtors want to provide that service.”

Many of these homes have serious electrical, structural and health problems that are not known to buyers.

Benninger said agents want to relay this information to their clients but “can’t disclose the information if we don’t have the information.”

The board asked Waterloo regional police to set up a public registry that would identify homes involved in marijuana grow operations.

But Insp. Bryan Larkin said police believe posting such information online would give a false sense of security to potential buyers. The issuing of a search warrant doesn’t always mean charges will be laid, he said.

If someone looks on the list and doesn’t see the address, they’ll believe they’re in the clear.

Real estate agents and potential home buyers already can have a police search done on a property to see if any search warrants have been conducted, but this costs $30.

“It’s unfortunately ‘buyer beware’ at this point,” said Tom Galloway, chair of the Waterloo Regional Police Service board.

But Larkin said police are “extremely committed” to doing something. In fact, they would to see the proposed list expanded to all illegal drug-making activity, including methamphetamine labs, not just marijuana-grow operations.

The police service and the real estate board have decided to look into other options, including inserting a clause into the Agreement of Purchase and Sale that states whether the property was ever used in an illegal drug-making or growing operation. Another is to lobby the provincial government to allow the regional public health department to disclose the information, which is how the situation is handled in Alberta.

“That’s the model we feel is more appropriate,” Galloway said.

The Calgary Health Region publishes all addresses that have been used in an illegal drug operation on its website, along with a list of any problems found by an inspector.

These problems can include such things as mould growth, tampering with the electrical system, chemical and fertilizer contamination and holes cut through the structure. A recent order posted notes that a house is “unfit for human habitation” and provided a list of renovations to be completed if the home could be occupied again.

Bruce Conway, a spokesperson for the Calgary Health Region, said a note is posted on the property to ensure anyone approaching knows of the situation.

“It’s for the public good,” Conway said.

Doug Quibell, manager of environmental health for the Region of Waterloo, said he hasn’t been approached about doing something like this but he is willing to discuss the possibility.

“Should they need our support in any way we’d be happy to do that,” he said.

The London Police Service publishes all addresses of homes where search warrants were used on indoor marijuana-grow operations. The website lists how many plants were seized and what charges were laid.

London police Const. Amanda Pfeffer said the service has been publishing the addresses for the past three years because of an increase in grow operations in the area.

Larkin said it’s not an increase in illegal drug operations that is driving the initiative locally. In fact, Larkin said, a police crackdown and community awareness have pushed many drug operations out of Waterloo Region.

For police, it’s an issue of ensuring the “health and safety and welfare of ( home ) buyers,” he said.

Benninger said she’s simply looking for any tools to ensure clients aren’t getting ripped off when they buy a home.

“We know consumers put a lot of trust in us and we want to make sure when they buy a house they know what they are getting,” she said.

Topics: Articles | Comments Off

Comments are closed.